viously, the following companies served as service providers for this information system: Erlan Research and Production Enterprise LLC, Kosmosoft Research and Implementation Company LLC, IBS Expertise LLC, and Softtelematica LLC. The press services of these companies did not respond to ComNews's question about their intention to participate in the procurement this time.
Among other companies uk whatsapp number databasethat were interested in the terms of the tender were PAO VimpelCom and OOO Softline Projects. This interest was due to complaints from these companies about Rosdormonitoring to the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS).
Rosdormonitoring placed the tender on July 16, 2024, and published clarifications to the requirements on July 29 and 31 in response to a request received. The names of the companies that sent clarifying questions are not published on the government procurement website.
The day after the clarifications were published, notifications about two complaints to the FAS appeared on the state procurement website. Because of this, for several days, from August 5 to 13, the acceptance of applications for participation in the tender was stopped, but resumed on August 19.
The complaint of "Softline Projects" was about "actions (inactions) of the customer, contract service, contract manager, authorized body, authorized institution in terms of the established provisions of the notice of the implementation of the procurement." However, according to the procurement website, this complaint was found to be unfounded.
it follows that Rosdormonitoring did not establish a ban on the admission of software originating from foreign countries, did not apply the mandatory form of a standard contract, and the description of the procurement object that it posted did not contain the necessary information and characteristics.
One of the requirements that directly influences the choice of a future supplier is the criteria for their evaluation. According to the appendix to the tender from Rosdormonitoring, the priorities by the importance of criteria for potential customers in the tender for the creation of a state or municipal information system are as follows: 30% of the importance of the criterion is the contract price, the sum of the prices of units of goods, work, services; 70% is the qualification of the procurement participant, the availability of material resources and relevant experience.
According to representatives of VimpelCom, establishing such a ratio of the significance of criteria for evaluating applications is unlawful, since the Rosdormonitoring information system is neither state nor municipal.
From the text of VimpelCom's complaint, which was accepted in part,
-
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:08 am