Alexey Samygin, senior lawyer at the National Center for Intellectual

[tanjimajuha20]

he experimental legal regime does not cancel the provisions of the Civil Code

AI as one of the types of technologies cannot be held responsible for its actions - the developer, owner or user of the system is responsible for its actions. "Dozens of developers are involved in the development and programming of neural networks. In this case, it becomes impossible to find the person responsible for the work of the AI. Also, the creators of the systems are not responsible for damage and do not compensate for losses incurred during their use. Most often, responsibility falls on the user if he distributes the results of the AI's work that violate Russian laws," said Pavel Frolov, founder and producer of JSC Robbo.

Capital (NCIC), noted india whatsapp number database that the bill does not contain provisions identifying specific persons responsible for causing harm, but in the proposed Article 181, the bill provides for a pre-trial procedure for considering cases of harm by a special commission.

"The Federal Law "On Experimental Legal Regimes in the Sphere of Digital Innovations" cannot affect the rules for determining liability for causing harm, either in its current version or in the event of the adoption of the proposed amendments. Liability for causing harm occurs in accordance with the terms of the Civil Code, and if in the future, as a result of the implementation of experimental legal regime programs, acceptable approaches to determining civil liability are developed that differ from those recorded in the Civil Code, then a change to the Civil Code itself will be required," explained Viktor Rykov, a lawyer at the Pen & Paper Bar Association.

Read also

The State Duma adopted "Sandboxes"
The State Duma of the Russian Federation has adopted in the third and final reading a law that establishes experimental legal regimes (ELR) in the field of digital innovation. "Regulatory sandboxes" will start working in Russia in early 2021. Special legal regimes are created for developments that use artificial intelligence, distributed registries, neurotechnologies, quantum and other technologies specified in the Government's list.

"Previously, there was a general rule that responsibility for property - in the broad sense - is borne by its owner/possessor, accordingly, if it caused harm, then such a person will be held liable. The amendments do not regulate the issue of who is liable, but rather simply say that in the proceedings - judicial or administrative - the results of the investigation of a special commission can still be used. As for practice, at the moment there is no established practice for such cases, so it is difficult to say about it yet," added Ivan Kaisarov, head of the intellectual property practice at Versus.legal.