Outlook was the most likely email provider to send political

[Rakibul200]

Key findings Overall, Republican emails are more likely than Democrat emails to be marked as spam ( vs. ). Outlook was the most likely to mark Democrat emails as spam and AOL was the most likely to mark Republican emails as spam . The email provider with the most biased spam filtering was Proton, which was x more likely to send Democrat emails to spam ( compared to ) and AOL was x more likely to mark Republican emails as spam ( compared to ).

emails of all spectrums to spam , followed by ghana telemarketing list Proton , and AOL . Gmail (the most used email provider in the US) sent of political emails to spam: of Democratic emails, and of Republican emails. Zoho was the least likely to send political emails to spam , followed by Gmail , and GMX . A Democratic candidate sends on average times more emails than a Republican candidate ( emails per Democrat candidate, and per Republican candidate) Fewer emails are going to spam than in the run-up to the last election: Compared to the report, where more than half of emails ended up in spam, only out of , emails ended up in spam .

Only of Joe Biden’s emails ended up in spam, compared to of Donald Trump’s emails In the study’s duration, Joe Biden sent out times more emails than Donald Trump How does a spam filter work, and what triggers it? In our professional experience, we count a deliverability rate (emails that do not bounce or end up in spam) of as excellent, to acceptable, and anything below as poor. In this study, of political emails went to spam – giving an deliverability rate.