Chatterbox. speaks for itself. These participants are certainly very useful for research, as a source of inexhaustible information, but their downside is that they simply do not give a chance to express their opinion to other, less sociable participants, who can only "join" the opinion of the talkers. In addition, such participants often think that they were invited just to chat.
In order to wait for an answer to a specific question, sometimes you have to listen to more than one backstory, that "once upon a time, when the participant still lived in Ainabulak and did not have her own germany cell phone number list family, and all the products were bought by her mother and this mother bought milk once, and the participant did not like it, and then at a party she did not like another milk, etc., etc. and that is why she buys such and such milk."
Silent. The opposite of a "chatterbox" is a "silent one". Here everything is exactly the opposite. It is very difficult to get information from a silent one. A silent one is often a "compromiser", since for some reason it is easier for him to agree with other participants than to express his point of view. As a rule, the benefit from such participants is minimal.
"Baba Yaga is against", or scientifically "antagonist". There are also such participants who never like anything, they are against everything, and just like in literary works, in focus groups they play the role of "villain", the instigator of conflicts. The situation in the focus group is especially heated when there are two such heroes, or when all the participants are divided into two opposing groups. A harmless form of behavior of the antagonist is not to express any valuable thoughts or information.
The name of the group of such participants
-
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:33 pm